Common Mistakes New Writers Make with Point of View

Point of view is one of those choices that looks simple until you try to hold it steady for 80,000 words. Readers rarely say, "the narrative perspective shifted in paragraph three." They say the story felt confusing, or distant, or as though someone kept changing the subject. Most POV trouble starts small: a borrowed thought, a detail the narrator could not know, a sentence that quietly hands the camera to somebody else.

Head-hopping: the slip readers feel before they can name it

Third person limited means the reader is tethered to one character's experience per scene: their senses, their assumptions, their blind spots. The slip usually looks like this.

Maya watched Tom cross the kitchen. She wanted to say something. Tom was still angry about the argument, and he wondered whether she would ever apologise.

Two problems in three sentences. We are inside Maya's head, then we are inside Tom's. New writers often defend this by explaining that the reader needs to know Tom is angry. They do. That does not mean you have to climb into his skull. Show it instead:

Maya watched Tom cross the kitchen. He set his mug down harder than he needed to and did not look at her.

Same information, one head. If you genuinely want both minds on the page, that is a legitimate choice; omniscient narration has been doing it for centuries. But it needs to be consistent across the whole book, not a convenience you reach for whenever a scene gets awkward.

Filtering: when every sense gets announced

Filtering is where you report the act of perceiving instead of giving the perception itself.

• She saw the door open. / The door opened.
• He heard the bell ring. / The bell rang.
• I felt the cold air on my neck. / Cold air moved across my neck.

Filter verbs — saw, heard, felt, noticed, watched, realised, thought — are not banned. In first person especially, a little filtering sounds like a mind in motion. Stacked up, though, they put a pane of glass between the reader and the scene. Take one page of your draft and underline every filter verb. Where a verb is doing no work, cut it and see what the sentence does on its own.

Knowing things your viewpoint character cannot know

An eleven-year-old narrator cannot describe the exact layout of a house she has never entered, or explain that the man in the doorway spent twelve years in the army. A third-person narrator tied to one character in one scene cannot report a conversation happening two streets away. And no character, in any perspective, has direct access to another person's private thoughts unless the perspective you have chosen allows it.

The fix is usually staging. If the reader needs a piece of information, give the viewpoint character a way to encounter it: overheard, guessed, read, half-remembered, or revealed by somebody else. Guessing is often better than knowing, because it lets the reader be right or wrong alongside them.

A note on first person

First person has its own version of this problem: the narrator who knows more than they could plausibly know at the time, or who reports events with a neatness no memory possesses. Ask what your narrator would actually recall, and in what order. Uncertainty, gaps and wrong turns are not flaws in a first-person voice; they are the texture of it.

Choosing a perspective before you write

The useful question is not which perspective is best. It is which one serves this story. Work through these before you commit to a draft:

1. Whose story changes most? That character usually earns the viewpoint, even if they are not the most likeable person in the room.
2. What does the reader need to be unsure about? If the tension depends on not knowing what the detective suspects, you cannot sit inside the detective's head for the whole book.
3. How close do you want the reader to sit? First person and tight third give intimacy and a limited view. A wider third or omniscient gives scale and irony, at the cost of warmth.
4. How many heads can the book carry? Two or three is comfortable for most readers. A dozen across a novel usually means none of them get deep enough to matter.
5. Which one can you sustain? Choose the perspective you can hold for chapter after chapter, not the one that makes the opening scene shine.

If you are torn, write the same opening page twice in two different perspectives. It takes half an hour and can save you a full rewrite later.

Tense, distance and drifting mid-scene

Consistency is not only about who sees. It is also about when, and from how far away.

Tense slips. A past-tense novel where a paragraph slides into present. "She opened the door. The room is dark and smells of damp." As a deliberate effect it can work; if it is not deliberate, it reads as a mistake.

Distance slips. A line of interior thought, then a paragraph of cool external narration, then back inside the character's head. Either register is fine on its own, but alternating within a scene leaves readers feeling seasick. Pick a distance for the scene — close, mid-range or panoramic — and stay roughly there.

Dialogue is a useful pressure valve. If information needs to reach the reader, letting one character tell another is often livelier than narrating it from above.

A point-of-view check for every chapter

Run this over each scene during revision. It takes ten minutes and catches most of the damage.

1. Name the viewpoint character for the scene in one word. If you cannot, the scene has a problem.
2. Read the first and last paragraph. Is it still that person's scene?
3. Highlight every thought, perception and fact. Could the viewpoint character access it at this point in the story?
4. Search for filter verbs and cut the ones doing nothing.
5. Check the tense paragraph by paragraph.
6. Read the scene aloud. The places you stumble are usually the places the perspective moved.

Point of view is a promise you make to the reader on page one. Keep it, and they will relax into the story and let you do whatever you like with them. Break it carelessly, and they will spend the rest of the book waiting for the ground to shift again.

Photo: FotoshopTofs / Pixabay